Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Uhhh?? Are you ripping out all core pls then? plPerlNG is supposed to > replace plPerl, I was talking with Bruce and he seemed to think that > (as long as the code was good enough) that we could incorporate > plPHP???
One reason against including plPHP in the core would be that it would create a circular build dependency between the packages postgresql and php. I think we should rather avoid that. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org