I worded that badly. I meant "allow a user to change the owner of something to what it already is". ie. Just make the no-op allowed by everyone. session_auth already does this.
Ah. Okay, no objection to that. (In fact I believe we put in the special case for session_auth for exactly the same reason.)
Actually, do I make it that anyone can do a no-op user change, or can only the user who is the existing owner do the no-op? It's a very tiny different and probably won't make much difference but perhaps it's better to make it a bit tighter check? What do you think?
Chris
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
