On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 12:02:47AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > We've also never had a single release before that had its version
> > > number jump determined by the number of features.
> >
> > That's a non-argument, Peter; we don't have any clear criteria for
> > version number jump.
>
> Oh yes, we have very clear criteria: For patch releases, we increase the
> third number, for feature releases we increase the second number and
> set the third number to zero. Clear enough?
What was the rule for increasing the first number after just before 7.0?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
"Vivir y dejar de vivir son soluciones imaginarias.
La existencia está en otra parte" (Andre Breton)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
