"Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Argument 3: backwards compatibility. Do you remember how tablespaces > introduction broke pgAdmin?
This argument, at least, is bogus. See my original comments to Josh: it is not credible that these views will be significantly more stable than the underlying catalogs. We don't change the catalogs on whims; we change them because we have to in order to make some significant improvement in functionality. For instance, if this nested-schema idea goes in, the proposed views will have to change, or else become useless for most of the purposes they are being touted for. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match