Isn't the standard to keep libpq.so.(n-1) whenever you bump the number up ?
Dave Volkan YAZICI wrote:
Hi,
On 5/19/05, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
8.0.2 and up should provide/require libpq.so.4 and so on. Apparently
there is something broken with this set of RPMs.
For futher of the discussion: http://lists.pgfoundry.org/pipermail/pgsqlrpms-hackers/2005-April/000197.html
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
