Dave Page wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 23 July 2005 20:01 > > To: Dave Page > > Cc: PostgreSQL-development > > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch > > > > > > This patch looks good. The only question I have is why you > > didn't want > > the pgport rename/unlink calls? We usually use them unless there is > > some reason not to. > > <thinks...> Probably because this was written originally for 7.4 (as a > pgAdmin contrib module) and I'm guessing the pgport rename/unlink > weren't there at that time. I can't think of any reason not to use them > - do you want an updated patch or are you OK to tweak it when applying?
No, I modified my version. Thanks. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
