Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:10:19 -0400,
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there an HTML standard that we try to follow in our HTML docs such as
FAQs?
If there isn't an explicit standard, may I suggest that we adopt XHTML
1.0 as the standard?
I ran accross an article a few weeks ago that suggested that this wasn't
all that great of an idea. Using HTML 4.01 should be just as useful.
I ran a cross a man in the street the other day who told me just the
opposite ;-)
Seriously, if you to use an argument like this you need to cite the
article, or at the very least summarise its arguments.
XHTML is simply a minimal reformulation of HTML in XML, and even uses
the HTML 4.01 definitions for its semantics. Given that, it's hard to
see why it should be considered a bad thing.
cheers
andrew
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
