On Sunday 13 November 2005 10:01, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On 11/13/05, Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 12 November 2005 04:06, Matteo Beccati wrote:
> > > | 1 | 1 | NULL |
> >
> > Wow, that seems ugly.... maybe there's a reason for it, but I'm not sure
> > we could deviate from my$ql's behavior on this even if we wanted... they
> > are the "standard" here.
>
> I don't think that's ugly, I think that's exactly working as
> advertised. Replace behaves exactly like deleting the record with the
> matching primary key and inserting the provided input. ... not merging
> together old data with new.
I disagree in that REPLACE is advertised as a solution for the INSERT else
UPDATE problem, but has a different behavior than a true INSERT else UPDATE
would produce. Maybe that's a problem with the implementation, or maybe
it's a problem in the advertisment, but there is certainly a discrepency
there.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
