On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 11:27:40AM -0700, Mark Wong wrote: > Jim C. Nasby wrote: > >On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 03:05:20PM -0400, Jonah H. Harris wrote: > >>All ideas welcome! > > > >I know it's not directly PostgreSQL related, but I'd love to see the > >dbt* code improved. Items on my wish-list: > > > >- make it easy to run the test framework and clients on a seperate > > machine from the database server > >- keep results in a database > >- provide a front-end to allow users to schedule tests in a queue > >- add support for windows, at least for the database (theoretically > > possible to run that way now, but you have to do everything by hand) > > > >Another idea: afaik, spikesource is still offering a bounty for > >improvements to OSS test suites, something that'd fit well with SoC. > > I second this. :) There are also the TPC-App (Java) fair-use > implementation that I've started and the TPC-E (next gen OLTP) that I > would like to start.
Maybe before starting on TPC-E it makes sense to try and get a common framework for all the different tests built? AFAIK most of the benchmarks all use a fairly standard client-server infrastructure, so we should hopefully be able to share that between the different tests... -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org