"Gurjeet Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't think Cristiano is asking for the schema_name in the
> EXPLAIN o/p. The request is for the table ALIASes to be shown in the
> o/p, which makes more sense than schema_name+table_name, since the
> same table can be used in the same query more than once.
But EXPLAIN has always shown the aliases.
Possibly a reasonable compromise would be for EXPLAIN to act like rule
reverse-listing does, that is, consult the schema search path and print
a qualified name only if the table wouldn't be found without it.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
