On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 07:01:38PM +0200, Lukas Smith wrote: > Jochem van Dieten wrote: > > >make the session handler smarter? And if you can't do that, put > >some logic in the session table that turns an update without > >changes into a no-op? > > err isnt that one the job of the database?
By no means. Even if there were zero overhead for this, which there couldn't be, you'd have a real problem auditing attempted actions. This would be a very big problem when trying to track down a rogue app and/or a denial of service attack. Cheers, D -- David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Skype: davidfetter Remember to vote! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
