Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: -- Start of PGP signed section. > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 03:40:40PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > This is also an interesting example for a tracker. If we had one, all > > discussion on the patch would be in one place, but I am thinking that > > would require all posting to happen in a browser, or somehow have emails > > tagged to attach to each item. Is that something that can happen > > easily? I don't know. Would the repost of a patch be attached to the > > original submission? > > In debbugs for example, the bug gets an email address > <bugnumber>@bugs.project.site. Anything sent to that address gets > recorded in the bug. So as long as people hit "reply-to-all" the whole > thread will be archived in the bug. > > I assume other bug trackers have a similar feature...
Oh, so the bug is tracked by being part of the email reply list. That is a good idea. Now, how does that get assigned for non-bugs, like patches? Does any email sent to the lists that doesn't already have a bug number get one? That might be really valuable. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
