Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Well, it's taken us the full month to get this far through the queue, so > >> I'd sure like to have more people on board reviewing next time. Alvaro > >> helped but I miss Neil Conway, and some other people have helped in the > >> past. However --- the present situation has nothing to do with lack of > >> reviewers, it's lack of time to finish the patches. > > > I did try to get us additional help in reviewing. Neil was unavailable, > > and Alvaro could only give part of his time. > > It strikes me that setting feature freeze in midsummer might not be the > best strategy for having manpower available to review --- people tend to > be on vacation in August. Maybe the answer is just to move the dates a > bit one way or the other.
Hmm...but if you're going to do that, why not do that now: push the beta date back by, say, a month (or however long you had in mind) for this cycle. That way, the two major patches that are likely to be dropped for this cycle stand a chance to make it into this release, and you accomplish your goal of moving the dates a bit all at the same time. -- Kevin Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match