Simon Riggs wrote: > I'm not clear about the difference between the unapplied patches list > and the hold list. What is the significance of the two lists? > > There's a number of patches submitted to pgsql-patches that don't show > up on either list. I haven't made a list of these, but they include > major patches such as Grouped Item indexes and a number of others. Many > of those are clearly marked as ready to apply/review/reject. > > Can I request that those be reviewed first? The unapplied patches list > looks long and many things on it aren't even patches, AFAICS - > presumably TODO items-in-waiting? > > Some minor points: > > [PATCHES] Incrementally Updated Backup, Simon Riggs > has already been applied to 8.2 > > [PATCHES] WAL logging freezing, Heikki Linnakangas > has already been agreed/applied to 8.2
Thanks. These two items have been removed from the patches hold queue. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
