Dave Page wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Dave Page wrote: > >> Bruce Momjian wrote: > >>> The issue is that the _hold_ patches are for patches that arrived after > >>> feature freeze. The patches that arrived after 8.2 was released don't > >>> go in there because it might cause confusion. I also have to control > >>> how quickly I push out patches from the queue so as not to overwhelm > >>> folks. > >> Perhaps it would cause less confusion to name the queues for the version > >> they will be reviewed/applied for, rather than to toggle between queue 1 > >> and 2, the logic of which isn't aways immediately obvious to the causal > >> observer. > > > > I don't actually toggle. Hold is for stuff during feature freeze. > > But then you go back to the other one once we're through freeze is what > I mean.
I kind of do both at the same time until the hold queue is empty. > > I am open to new names. > > patches-8_3 ? Anything coming in after FF then goes to patches-8_4. The problem there is that the web site references these, so changing the URL for every release is odd, plus right now both queues are for 8.3. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings