>> I don't mind this term, BUT, what we need to get across is not just that >> these are extensions, but that they are *standard* extensions, supplied >> with PostgreSQL core code and supported by the PostgreSQL core team. >> This would be analogous with, say, the standard perl modules (like >> Exporter or IO::Handle) that come with the standard perl source >> distribution. If we can get that idea across then we might lower the >> resistance of people like hosting providers to loading them.
Furthering the perception is reality rule perhaps the schema should be called std_ext? > > Integrating their docs into the standard PostgreSQL SGML (or XML, > should we go there) docs would go a long, long way toward helping with > this. Agreed. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate