Josh Berkus wrote:
> Magnus,
>
>> I'd also vote for changing the name of the "non encrypted" version to
>> just "gss" instead of "gss-np".
>
> I don't. We'll want to support GSS encryption once we have the code, so we
> should leave the namespace open to address that.
>
>> Oh, and I do think putting in GSSAPI authentication only (and not
>> encryption) is the way to go for now, since we can do encryption with
>> OpenSSL. It'll make the changes localized to just the authentication.
>
> For now, yes. In the long run, we want to provide users with other methods
> of encrypted connections than the rather flaky and
> not-available-on-every-platform OpenSSL.
I'm curious - on what platform is OpenSSL NOT available ?
Stefan
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
