-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
- --On Wednesday, May 16, 2007 21:04:27 -0400 Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jonah H. Harris wrote: >> On 5/16/07, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Set a fixed date (ie. 3 weeks) and whatever isn't in gets punted to 8.4 >> > ... if that means those 'large patches' don't get applied, so be it ... >> >> I disagree with that approach. Larger more complex patches required >> much more work and effort than small, simple ones. Not only do I >> think it's unfair to the authors who spent considerably more time on >> their work, but I think it also sets a bad precedent for future work; >> saying, in short, that if you want to make large strides to improve >> PostgreSQL, and you followed the community development process, you're >> still potentially last in line for review. > > Yep. We lose a lot of credibility if we did that. So, we lose no credibility if we sit in feature freeze indefinitely, with no direction, while we wait for reviewers to finish reviewing? - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGS7E64QvfyHIvDvMRAmW9AJ0Q75300Atm6nFOFT+1YfMRCtrcdQCffW2l htlQKO5dZRC2k2lWPGkjGvk= =BhsF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq