On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:51:47PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > However, neither the new nor the old scripts run ECPG tests on my setup, 
> > so I have been unable to test that.
> 
> I'm confused.  We have MSVC buildfarm animals that show green, so aren't
> they getting through ECPG tests?

Yeah, I'm confused too. I thought they did, but looking at my own animal
(Skylark) it seems not to be running any ecpg checks?

Oh, and I'm now seeing failures on my dev box with ECPG on the MSVC build
using "the old way" (.bat-files):
    array_of_struct.c
    array_of_struct.pgc(26): error C2065: 'customer' : undeclared identifier
    array_of_struct.pgc(26): error C2146: syntax error : missing ';' before 
identifier 'custs1'
    array_of_struct.pgc(26): error C2065: 'custs1' : undeclared identifier
    array_of_struct.pgc(26): error C2109: subscript requires array or pointer 
type
    array_of_struct.pgc(27): error C2065: 'cust_ind' : undeclared identifier
    array_of_struct.pgc(27): error C2146: syntax error : missing ';' before 
identifier 'inds'
    array_of_struct.pgc(27): error C2065: 'inds' : undeclared identifier
    array_of_struct.pgc(27): error C2109: subscript requires array or pointer 
type
    array_of_struct.pgc(33): error C2275: 'customer2' : illegal use of this 
type as an expression
    array_of_struct.pgc(32) : see declaration of 'customer2'


(it goes on like that for quite a bit, total of 70 errors in this file)

If this has never run on the buildfarm, my guess is that it's been broken
for about 5 weeks - when the "major rewrite" got in.

Can someone confirm if this has ever executed on the buildfarm? Or if they
the same errors with HEAD that I do? I haven't been running ecpgcheck
manually for quite a while, since I thought it was on the bf run.

If it breaks for everybody I'll try to dig into why, but I just want that
confirmed first...


//Magnus

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match

Reply via email to