Gregory Stark wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I know I just love it when a customer breaks something and I ask what >> changed and it is 56 different things ;) >> >> My question is.. with a checkpoint every 2 months, would it make it >> very easy to release every 6 (or 4 or 3 or 9) months? I am not saying >> we "have" to but it certainly opens up the possibility to the argument >> I made. > > We could release "alpha" releases. But that assumes that these reviews > actually result in stuff getting committed even if they're not 100% complete.
That's sounding a lot like mysql.. Next you'll start recommending people to run that in production.. :-P //Magnus ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
