Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm fairly resistant to putting less-than-ready code in the tree, I must > say.
Me too, at least if "less than ready" means "unstable". The committed code has to always be solid enough to let everybody continue working on their own bits. However, in the past we've tended to refuse stuff if it "didn't do anything interesting", and I think that attitude will need adjustment. We'll have to be prepared to accept patches that are only interesting as waystations to some long-term goal. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster