On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 12:05:26AM +0300, Hannu Krosing wrote: > Ühel kenal päeval, L, 2007-10-27 kell 12:55, kirjutas Josh Berkus: > > Merlin, Pavel, > > > > > Mutable session variables would be nice, but I'll take a plpgsql > > > langauge (or psm) with or without them, so long as transactions > > > are manual. It's possible to emulate variables using scalar > > > functions with the desired volatility currently (but you still > > > have to be careful with transactions). > > > > The other big useful feature we're missing from Functions is > > multisets. > > I think that support for multisets has been removed from our fe-be > protocol implementation bit-by-bit.
How do you mean? The only way I've done multisets is by creating functions that return multiple refcursors, either in a row or as SETOF. Is or was there some other way? Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org