>
>
> Barry Lind wrote:
> > Joseph,
> >
> > In looking at this patch it looks OK, except for the following change:
> >
> > > ! if (index>=-rows.size())
> > > --- 725,737 ----
> > > ! if (index > rows_size)
> >
> > I haven't looked at the entire method, but the change you made seems
> > incorrect.
> >
> Oops! Thanks for catching that. Cut and paste error. I hate those.
>
> > If you want this patch to be applied it should be sent to the
> > pgsql-patches mail list.
>
>
> I thought that jdbc stuff was preferred to be on the jdbc list. I guess not.
Actually, yes, I throw stuff to jdbc and patches for completeness. jdbc
people, tell me what you want done in the future.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
