Barry Lind wrote:
> Joseph,
>
> In looking at this patch it looks OK, except for the following change:
>
> > ! if (index>=-rows.size())
> > --- 725,737 ----
> > ! if (index > rows_size)
>
> I haven't looked at the entire method, but the change you made seems
> incorrect.
>
Oops! Thanks for catching that. Cut and paste error. I hate those.
> If you want this patch to be applied it should be sent to the
> pgsql-patches mail list.
I thought that jdbc stuff was preferred to be on the jdbc list. I guess not.
new patch:
*** ResultSet.java.orig Tue Sep 4 16:34:14 2001
--- ResultSet.java Wed Sep 5 15:35:59 2001
***************
*** 134,140 ****
{
//release resources held (memory for tuples)
if(rows!=null) {
- rows.setSize(0);
rows=null;
}
}
--- 134,139 ----
***************
*** 709,716 ****
public int findColumn(String columnName) throws SQLException
{
int i;
!
! for (i = 0 ; i < fields.length; ++i)
if (fields[i].getName().equalsIgnoreCase(columnName))
return (i+1);
throw new PSQLException ("postgresql.res.colname",columnName);
--- 708,715 ----
public int findColumn(String columnName) throws SQLException
{
int i;
! final int flen = fields.length;
! for (i = 0 ; i < flen; ++i)
if (fields[i].getName().equalsIgnoreCase(columnName))
return (i+1);
throw new PSQLException ("postgresql.res.colname",columnName);
***************
*** 726,736 ****
if (index==0)
throw new SQLException("Cannot move to index of 0");
//if index<0, count from the end of the result set, but check
//to be sure that it is not beyond the first index
if (index<0)
! if (index>=-rows.size())
! internalIndex=rows.size()+index;
else {
beforeFirst();
return false;
--- 725,737 ----
if (index==0)
throw new SQLException("Cannot move to index of 0");
+ final int rows_size = rows.size();
+
//if index<0, count from the end of the result set, but check
//to be sure that it is not beyond the first index
if (index<0)
! if (index > -rows_size)
! internalIndex = rows_size+index;
else {
beforeFirst();
return false;
***************
*** 739,745 ****
//must be the case that index>0,
//find the correct place, assuming that
//the index is not too large
! if (index<=rows.size())
internalIndex = index-1;
else {
afterLast();
--- 740,746 ----
//must be the case that index>0,
//find the correct place, assuming that
//the index is not too large
! if (index <= rows_size)
internalIndex = index-1;
else {
afterLast();
***************
*** 753,760 ****
public void afterLast() throws SQLException
{
! if (rows.size() > 0)
! current_row = rows.size();
}
public void beforeFirst() throws SQLException
--- 754,762 ----
public void afterLast() throws SQLException
{
! final int rows_size = rows.size();
! if (rows_size > 0)
! current_row = rows_size;
}
public void beforeFirst() throws SQLException
***************
*** 967,973 ****
public boolean isAfterLast() throws SQLException
{
! return (current_row >= rows.size() && rows.size() > 0);
}
public boolean isBeforeFirst() throws SQLException
--- 969,976 ----
public boolean isAfterLast() throws SQLException
{
! final int rows_size = rows.size();
! return (current_row >= rows_size && rows_size > 0);
}
public boolean isBeforeFirst() throws SQLException
***************
*** 982,995 ****
public boolean isLast() throws SQLException
{
! return (current_row == rows.size() -1 && rows.size() > 0);
}
public boolean last() throws SQLException
{
! if (rows.size() <= 0)
return false;
! current_row = rows.size() - 1;
this_row = (byte [][])rows.elementAt(current_row);
return true;
}
--- 985,1000 ----
public boolean isLast() throws SQLException
{
! final int rows_size = rows.size();
! return (current_row == rows_size -1 && rows_size > 0);
}
public boolean last() throws SQLException
{
! final int rows_size = rows.size();
! if (rows_size <= 0)
return false;
! current_row = rows_size - 1;
this_row = (byte [][])rows.elementAt(current_row);
return true;
}
***************
*** 1480,1483 ****
}
}
}
-
--- 1485,1487 ----
--
Joseph Shraibman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Increase signal to noise ratio. http://www.targabot.com
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
