Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Robert Treat wrote: > > > I see hardly any use case for showing only user-defined functions > > > or types by default. I think consistency is not necessarily > > > desirable here. > > > > See the archives for previous discussion and/or use cases. > > I didn't find any. Nevertheless, while there are undoubtedly some uses > for everything, making this the default behavior does not seem > acceptable.
I think the logical issue is that a database with no user tables is useless/empty, so showing only user tables makes sense, while a database with no user functions is still useful, and in fact I would think most databases have no user functions. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
