On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 13:25, Kasim Oztoprak wrote: > On 24 Jul 2003 17:08 EEST you wrote: > > > On 24 Jul 2003 at 15:54, Kasim Oztoprak wrote: [snip] > > we do not have memory problem or disk problems. as I have seen in the list the best > way to > use disks are using raid 10 for data and raid 1 for os. we can put as much memory as > we require. > > now the question, if we have 100 searches per second and in each search if we need > 30 sql > instruction, what will be the performance of the system in the order of time. Let us > say > we have two machines described aove in a cluster.
That's 3000 sql statements per second, 180 thousand per minute!!!! What the heck is this database doing!!!!! A quad-CPU Opteron sure is looking useful right about now... Or an quad-CPU AlphaServer ES45 running Linux, if 4x Opterons aren't available. How complicated are each of these SELECT statements? -- +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Jefferson, LA USA | | | | "I'm not a vegetarian because I love animals, I'm a vegetarian | | because I hate vegetables!" | | unknown | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
