<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OPEN cur_overlap FOR SELECT *, pg_class.RELNAME AS table FROM 
> calendar_entries WHERE (start_date, end_date) OVERLAP (new_start_date, 
> new_end_date) AND property_id = X AND pg_class.oid = tableoid;

> The only thing I can think of is that when the query runs in the psql I get:
> NOTICE: added missing FROM-clause entry for table "pg_class"

> I understand why this is happening, but don't know how I would go
> about re-writing the query to explicitly reference pg_class - I can't
> write calendar_entries.table_oid, because that changes the meaning of
> the query.

How so?  It'd be the same as far as I can see.

However, you could avoid any explicit use of pg_class by using the
regclass type instead:

OPEN cur_overlap FOR SELECT *, tableoid::regclass AS table FROM 
calendar_entries WHERE (start_date, end_date) OVERLAP (new_start_date, 
new_end_date) AND property_id = X;

As far as the reason for the difference between function execution and
manual execution: check for unintended variable substitutions.  Which
words in the query match variable names in the plpgsql function?  Are
those only the ones you intended?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Reply via email to