On 8 August 2013 13:35, Levente Uzonyi <le...@elte.hu> wrote: > On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> >> On Aug 7, 2013, at 8:44 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Well, my intent was to keep working together on it and be as open as >>> possible to >>> people who may not work particularly on Pharo, but care/use Cog. >>> >>> >>> Now my dilemma is, what is the fate of Cog tracker? >>> >>> On 7 August 2013 20:29, Guillermo Polito <guillermopol...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I think that's not true at all. >>>> >>>> Our git repo and our vmmaker repo are used to build only the pharo vm >>>> flavor. If we make a fix it does not get magically integrated into >>>> eliots >>>> cog. >>>> >>> >>> Guillermo , it is not 'our' and never been. It belongs to community, >>> and Pharo is just part of it. >>> I had hard time convincing people to join and use git and tracker.. >>> Now this move puts a big cross on all these efforts. >>> >>> >>> Of course i understand the benefits of having everything at one place. >>> And of course we (as Pharo team) are free to organize own work in a >>> way we see fit. >> >> >> indeed but do not see the devil everywhere >> why putting the issue on a public tracker means private? > > > How is that a "public tracker"? >
can you elaborate? https://pharo.fogbugz.com/ is publicly accessible, no? or what makes you think it is not public? > > Levente > > >> >>> But i don't think we will find understanding if we start privatizing >>> things which are not belong to us. >>> Because initially this stuff was created without intent to be >>> 'pharo-only' or for 'pharo-only'. >> >> >> >> You see that clement is implementing clean blocks and that eliot wants to >> integrate his work in COG. >> >> >> Stef >> >>> >>>> Maybe they can benefit from the changes but they have to merge back as >>>> you >>>> esteban and igor merge in our branch. >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> Igor Stasenko. >>> >> >> > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
