On Sep 26, 2013, at 3:57 PM, Camillo Bruni <camillobr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 2013-09-26, at 10:23, "Sean P. DeNigris" <s...@clipperadams.com> wrote: > >> Marcus Denker-4 wrote >>> The problem is that if we have over 500 entries, people just give up. >>> They say "what use is it to fix 1, there are just too many". >> >> Okay, so I think a "Resolved" status like "Stale" would be a good >> compromise. Then we can close the issue, but it will be tagged as to the >> reason, so in my example I can have a filter for closed issues tagged Stale, >> and easily reopen them if necessary. The problem is that now I have to wade >> through hundreds of closed issues I worked on to find the ones that were >> closed due to inactivity - not fun. > > > we have a couple of statuses that come close to that: > Resolved Postponed indeed Postponed should be close to stale and I understand Sean concerns. > Resolved Won't Fix > > If you want we can decide upon Postponed and then close them. > Could you check that this is in sync with the status description? > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?W65
