On 17 oct. 2013, at 12:20, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I just important an important change in Pharo. 
> I made a new step over the integration of RPackage into the system, and as a 
> result there is a different behavior. 
> Although 99% of users shouldn't notice it, that can drive to headaches to 
> tool developers, like Thierry and his AltBrowser (but I'm not sure about 
> that) :)  
> I'm sorry, but this is inevitable... and part of a long path discussed and 
> adopted since almost 1 1/2 years. 
> 
> So, what's the change?
> Now 1 RPackage 0 1 MCPackage. 

Awesome!!

> As a result, package granularity is coarse, and then categories for class are 
> stored as package tags.

Fantastic!!! 

> Other consequence is that RPackageSet is now more or less useless, but I'm 
> keeping it because it provides caching services  for monticello, and the 
> speed up resulting is good :)
> This change opens the path to remove old PackageInfo, finally :)
> To take the new structure into account (and to add a long time awaited 
> feature), I modified nautilus to use a tree instead a simple list (finally!)

Fabulous!!!

> And since I was in the mood, I moved groups to same list, taking the idea of 
> the screenshot Stef sent the other day (lots of good ideas that we should 
> adopt there), and then I removed the "groups" button... in functionality is 
> good, but visually not so much... I accept ideas about :)
> THERE WILL BE BUGS!
> This is a really deep and important change

Indeed!
Esteban, thank you for all your hard work.
Now I'm forced to believe in god. He and I are working in the same office ;)


> , I'm pushing it because we need to test and fix. So, do not hesitate to send 
> your reports!
> Also, there are features in modified-nautilus that are missing. It would be 
> good to have a list of them so I can implement it :)
> 
> Please, report any issue around. 
> Enjoy, 
> Esteban
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to