Since we can inject javascript in fogbugz, we should give a try to add a voting system :P
Ben On 30 Dec 2013, at 12:12, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 29 Dec 2013, at 23:34, [email protected] wrote: > >> Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >>> >>> that’s usually done by the integrators, but nothing prevents you to do it >>> :) >>> >> I thought wider community involvement was encouraged for anyone to provide >> the peer review to move items to status Resolved Fix To Include >> with the integrators then moving it to status Resolved Fix Included (and >> then usually straight to Closed status) >> > > Yes, but for a real working system we would need a voting scheme… > > right now it matters not much as everything is manual, but of it would be > automatic, it would be nice to have something like “two people > who are commuters say it’s goo then it is good to be integrated > automatically”.] > > > Right now the idea is that people can set the “fix to include” if they are > 150% sure that is is a good change. It’s better to just add a note > to the “fix review needed” so then someone else will say “he thinks it’s > good, I double checked, so it’s good”. > > So, in short: we need a better system, but for now it kind of works. > > Marcus > >
