If Linus Torvald is your model, then I quit Pharo :P Ben
On 30 Dec 2013, at 17:12, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: > please don’t. > Democracy does not make sense. Do you think that linus is taking into account > democracy vote when fixing core of linux? > > Stef > > >> Since we can inject javascript in fogbugz, we should give a try to add a >> voting system :P >> >> Ben >> >> On 30 Dec 2013, at 12:12, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 29 Dec 2013, at 23:34, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>>> Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >>>>> >>>>> that’s usually done by the integrators, but nothing prevents you to do it >>>>> :) >>>>> >>>> I thought wider community involvement was encouraged for anyone to provide >>>> the peer review to move items to status Resolved Fix To Include >>>> with the integrators then moving it to status Resolved Fix Included (and >>>> then usually straight to Closed status) >>>> >>> >>> Yes, but for a real working system we would need a voting scheme… >>> >>> right now it matters not much as everything is manual, but of it would be >>> automatic, it would be nice to have something like “two people >>> who are commuters say it’s goo then it is good to be integrated >>> automatically”.] >>> >>> >>> Right now the idea is that people can set the “fix to include” if they are >>> 150% sure that is is a good change. It’s better to just add a note >>> to the “fix review needed” so then someone else will say “he thinks it’s >>> good, I double checked, so it’s good”. >>> >>> So, in short: we need a better system, but for now it kind of works. >>> >>> Marcus >>> >>> >> >
