+1 Am 30.12.2013 um 17:30 schrieb Benjamin <[email protected]>:
> If Linus Torvald is your model, then I quit Pharo :P > > Ben > > On 30 Dec 2013, at 17:12, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: > >> please don’t. >> Democracy does not make sense. Do you think that linus is taking into >> account democracy vote when fixing core of linux? >> >> Stef >> >> >>> Since we can inject javascript in fogbugz, we should give a try to add a >>> voting system :P >>> >>> Ben >>> >>> On 30 Dec 2013, at 12:12, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On 29 Dec 2013, at 23:34, [email protected] wrote: >>>> >>>>> Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> that’s usually done by the integrators, but nothing prevents you to do >>>>>> it :) >>>>>> >>>>> I thought wider community involvement was encouraged for anyone to >>>>> provide the peer review to move items to status Resolved Fix To Include >>>>> with the integrators then moving it to status Resolved Fix Included (and >>>>> then usually straight to Closed status) >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, but for a real working system we would need a voting scheme… >>>> >>>> right now it matters not much as everything is manual, but of it would be >>>> automatic, it would be nice to have something like “two people >>>> who are commuters say it’s goo then it is good to be integrated >>>> automatically”.] >>>> >>>> >>>> Right now the idea is that people can set the “fix to include” if they are >>>> 150% sure that is is a good change. It’s better to just add a note >>>> to the “fix review needed” so then someone else will say “he thinks it’s >>>> good, I double checked, so it’s good”. >>>> >>>> So, in short: we need a better system, but for now it kind of works. >>>> >>>> Marcus >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
