Tudor Girba-2 wrote > First, would it be Ok with you to move the project to a more public place
Great, whereever you think... Tudor Girba-2 wrote > Second, I created a configuration with a development and stable version. Cool, thanks :) Tudor Girba-2 wrote > Please note that I named the configuration Spotter, > because there already exists a ConfigurationOfSpotlight for the widget of > Esteban. Would it be Ok to change the name of the classes, too, to avoid > confusion? I would prefer ConfigurationOfNewSpotlight or ConfigurationOfSpotlight2. Spotlight is what we are modeling, and introducing a new term will I think generate more confusion (i.e. "what the heck is a Spotter" vs. "oh, cool, just like the Mac Spotlight that I already use"). Tudor Girba-2 wrote > Third, I think we should not mix the morph with the global shortcut. I > understand this is convenient, but these should pretty much be different > projects. Is that Ok with you? I guess as a compromise I can just extract the shortcut into another package, so the default will not integrate with the system, and loading the additional package will. For me, I want this widget to come up on shift + cr. Tudor Girba-2 wrote > Fourth, I would like to theme this morph, too :). With this occasion, I > would like to try a slightly different design for handling the theme code. This is exciting. I found Polymorph / Themes to be very confusing. I welcome another look at this. ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Spotlight-Demo-tp4733076p4734781.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
