On 09 Jan 2014, at 10:50, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> wrote:
>
> On 09 Jan 2014, at 10:45, Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9 January 2014 10:38, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote:
>> The history hack did totally not work for end users, many people, including
>> myself, lost code, often without noticing or understanding it at first.
>>
>> This 'warning, you did not accept' is/was important and solid, if you want
>> to replace that the solution should be really good - it was not.
>>
>> Don't shoot on Nicolai, he tried to fix it, after asking around.
>>
>> i'm not shooting anyone, i just sad there is no progress :)
>> and instead even regress, because now i should also answer 'yes/no' when i
>> press
>> cmd-L..
>>
>> If some people will need to be asked are they really really really fucking
>> sure they wanted to press a key they pressed, each time they pressing the
>> key, why others, who don't need such stupidity should suffer?
>>
>
> These are two different issue:
>
> 1) CMD-L
The real solution is to implement undo for cmd-L...
> 2) Not asking in general and rely on history.
>
This is a good idea but it needs to *work*
Marcus
