On 23 Sep 2014, at 00:50, Martin McClure <mar...@hand2mouse.com> wrote:
> On 09/22/2014 09:50 AM, Marcus Denker wrote:
>>
>> On 22 Sep 2014, at 17:05, Martin McClure <mar...@hand2mouse.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This fix required multiple slices since loading things in the wrong order
>>> broke exceptions badly enough to hang the system. I packaged things in five
>>> slices. (It's possible that if Monticello was smart enough I could have
>>> done it in less than five, but it did need more than one).
>>>
>>> The automatic test runner seems to only load the first of the five slices.
>>> Therefore two exception tests fail, which is expected. All exception tests
>>> should pass after all five slices are loaded in order.
>>>
>>> Is there a way to tell the automatic test runner to load all five, or does
>>> this one require manual testing? (I did test it manually before dropping
>>> the slices in the inbox, but that was a month ago.)
>>
>> Maybe for a complex change like that we should sync off list… the normal
>> machinery is good for normal stuff, everything else needs exceptional work.
>> (e.g. we could load changesets, could be simpler than using monticello)
>
> OK, let me know how you want to proceed. If you load the five slices from the
> inbox, in sequence
Looks good! Last time I merged I got strange conflicts, but now everything
looks fine.
I will integrate all this with 5 updates later today.
Thanks!
Marcus
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
