and where is your enhance proposal? I made a fogbugz search and I didn’t find anything related to improve “cmd+o"
Esteban > On 03 Oct 2014, at 09:28, p...@highoctane.be wrote: > > Well, I am COMPLAINING LOUDLY about this lack of menu entries then. > > I hate this super shrunk list of entries in the playground and the GT > toolset. I love GT, but I hate those damn menus that do not have what I do > need (which is give me the full menu where I do use the same options Kilon > mentioned). > > Also, on Cmd-o used to open about all tools, yes, Cmd-o Cmd-p --> Monticello > > Cmd-o Cmd-w --> Workspace > > Cmd-o Cmd-b --> Browser > > etc. > > Just GTInspect > > KMCategory allInstances > > and see the two global shortcuts categories (one for Spotlight, one for the > global shortcuts - and yeah, they should have a name displayed other than > nil). > > On my own little Pharo, I've set addtional shortcuts for the Finder, the File > Browser etc as these are sorely missing. > > And GT as well. Cmd-o Cmd-g for opening a Play<g>round. > So that I can keep Cmd-o Cmd-w for opening a Workspace and keeping all of its > abilities intact (and not feel crippled by those replacements). > > I actually like Esteban's proposal for Cmd-g as what we do with the > playground is "give it a go", which is different from a doIt, which can stay > local and not have side effects on the right side. > > Phil > > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr > <mailto:marcus.den...@inria.fr>> wrote: > > On 02 Oct 2014, at 21:36, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com > <mailto:tu...@tudorgirba.com>> wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 5:19 PM, kilon alios <kilon.al...@gmail.com >> <mailto:kilon.al...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> Is it just me or is the Playground a big step back in the usability of Pharo >> ? >> >> For me its Gui makes no sense. Gone is the right click menu which had tons >> of useful actions now you only get like a few options. The tab thing is >> weird to say the least with the navigation of the tabs being in the opposite >> side (bottom) of the navigation of the internal tabs(top). No more right >> arrow menu for shortcuts and many features that workspace had. >> >> I will concede that the contextual menu is incomplete. We will work on that. >> In the meantime, the keybindings work as in the classic workspace. >> > > And one needs to take into account that the “pull” strategy for menu items is > much better than a “push”: Instead of adding just everything that was there, > wait till people > get *really* upset and implement it. This proves that they *really* need it > :-) > > In a way we used that strategy *a lot* for Pharo… we removed so many menu > entries everywhere. Or Settings… the amount of settings that I removed, I > guess >100? > > And the fun thing is: nobody ever complained :-) > > But if I would have asked: you can be sure that someone reacts like “I never > used it but now that you tell me, I want to keep it”. > (this is true for every unused feature. Just remove and wait. Never ask. If > you ask you will have to keep it. People react to removing unused features as > if you would > take something away from them that was just stored securely for bad times, as > if it would be deeply ingrained in our genes or something). > > Marcus >
