Frankly, I see fogbugz issues closed with some ignore/cannot reproduce status, so, I am not creating any of them anymore. Why bother, except for blocking bugs?
I have a set of adjustments on my side and work with them. https://gist.github.com/philippeback is where I store them, an in HOExtras in my SmalltalkHub account. Sad attitude, but I tell you how it is for me. Phil On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote: > and where is your enhance proposal? > I made a fogbugz search and I didn’t find anything related to improve > “cmd+o" > > Esteban > > On 03 Oct 2014, at 09:28, p...@highoctane.be wrote: > > Well, I am COMPLAINING LOUDLY about this lack of menu entries then. > > I hate this super shrunk list of entries in the playground and the GT > toolset. I love GT, but I hate those damn menus that do not have what I do > need (which is give me the full menu where I do use the same options Kilon > mentioned). > > Also, on Cmd-o used to open about all tools, yes, Cmd-o Cmd-p --> > Monticello > > Cmd-o Cmd-w --> Workspace > > Cmd-o Cmd-b --> Browser > > etc. > > Just GTInspect > > KMCategory allInstances > > and see the two global shortcuts categories (one for Spotlight, one for > the global shortcuts - and yeah, they should have a name displayed other > than nil). > > On my own little Pharo, I've set addtional shortcuts for the Finder, the > File Browser etc as these are sorely missing. > > And GT as well. Cmd-o Cmd-g for opening a Play<g>round. > So that I can keep Cmd-o Cmd-w for opening a Workspace and keeping all of > its abilities intact (and not feel crippled by those replacements). > > I actually like Esteban's proposal for Cmd-g as what we do with the > playground is "give it a go", which is different from a doIt, which can > stay local and not have side effects on the right side. > > Phil > > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> > wrote: > >> >> On 02 Oct 2014, at 21:36, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 5:19 PM, kilon alios <kilon.al...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Is it just me or is the Playground a big step back in the usability of >>> Pharo ? >>> >>> For me its Gui makes no sense. Gone is the right click menu which had >>> tons of useful actions now you only get like a few options. The tab thing >>> is weird to say the least with the navigation of the tabs being in the >>> opposite side (bottom) of the navigation of the internal tabs(top). No more >>> right arrow menu for shortcuts and many features that workspace had. >>> >> >> I will concede that the contextual menu is incomplete. We will work on >> that. In the meantime, the keybindings work as in the classic workspace. >> >> >> And one needs to take into account that the “pull” strategy for menu >> items is much better than a “push”: Instead of adding just everything that >> was there, wait till people >> get *really* upset and implement it. This proves that they *really* need >> it :-) >> >> In a way we used that strategy *a lot* for Pharo… we removed so many menu >> entries everywhere. Or Settings… the amount of settings that I removed, I >> guess >100? >> >> And the fun thing is: nobody ever complained :-) >> >> But if I would have asked: you can be sure that someone reacts like “I >> never used it but now that you tell me, I want to keep it”. >> (this is true for every unused feature. Just remove and wait. Never ask. >> If you ask you will have to keep it. People react to removing unused >> features as if you would >> take something away from them that was just stored securely for bad >> times, as if it would be deeply ingrained in our genes or something). >> >> Marcus >> > > >
