> On 29.10.2014, at 01:17, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Good question :). > I do not know I would say that having the package Unpackaged would be better > than nil
So maybe the bug is that it should not be allowed to pass nil as category? > > On 28/10/14 16:26, Max Leske wrote: >> I just fixed a couple of Fuel tests that failed because it is possible to >> create a trait with the category set to nil. When creating a new trait with >> the same name this results in an exception being signaled. Should we >> consider this a bug? It’s not cool to create a trait in category nil but >> since it’s possible… Should I open an issue? >> >> Cheers, >> Max >> >> >>> On 28.10.2014, at 20:42, Max Leske <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Oh yeah! Maybe now the Fuel tests will be back to green :) >>> >>>> On 28.10.2014, at 20:23, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Thanks esteban! >>>> I'm unstuck :) >>>> >>>> On 28/10/14 07:41, GitHub wrote: >>>>> 40336 >>>>> 14337 Removing a trait usage raises an exception (2nd attempt) >>>>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14337 >>>> >> >> >> > >
