2014-10-29 9:30 GMT+01:00 Max Leske <[email protected]>: > > On 29.10.2014, at 08:22, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Wednesday, Oct 29, 2014 at 8:18 am, Max Leske <[email protected]>, > wrote: > >> > On 29.10.2014, at 01:17, stepharo wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Good question :). >> >> > I do not know I would say that having the package Unpackaged would be >> better than nil >> @free.fr> > > >> So maybe the bug is that it should not be allowed to pass nil as category? >> >> >> @free.fr> > > We need the concept of "this is code that is automatically generated, it > is not part of any package and this is meant to be like that". > > > Nautilus (or RPackage?) does provide the 'Unpackaged' category. Wouldn't > that be "good enough" for now? >
RPackage :) Thierry > > (there is now code in a package Generated-code-non-existing-package that > is of that kind, but the problem is that this package is always dirty of > code gets generated). > > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14097/generated-code-non-existing-package-has-uncommited-code > > Would be nice if someone would implement a solution for this. > > > For libgit2 I simply sublassed NB and put the auto-generated methods into > the protocols I choose. Of course that's not a general solution. > > >> > >> >> > On 28/10/14 16:26, Max Leske wrote: >> >> >> I just fixed a couple of Fuel tests that failed because it is possible >> to create a trait with the category set to nil. When creating a new trait >> with the same name this results in an exception being signaled. Should we >> consider this a bug? It's not cool to create a trait in category nil but >> since it's possible... Should I open an issue? >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> Max >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 28.10.2014, at 20:42, Max Leske wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Oh yeah! Maybe now the Fuel tests will be back to green :) >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> On 28.10.2014, at 20:23, stepharo wrote: >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Thanks esteban! >> >> >>>> I'm unstuck :) >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> On 28/10/14 07:41, GitHub wrote: >> >> >>>>> 40336 >> >> >>>>> 14337 Removing a trait usage raises an exception (2nd attempt) >> >> >>>>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14337 >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> @free.fr>@gmail.com>@free.fr> > > >
