> On 29 Oct 2014, at 09:54, Max Leske <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> On 29.10.2014, at 09:45, Marcus Denker <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> @free.fr <http://free.fr/>>
>>>> We need the concept of “this is code that is automatically generated, it
>>>> is not part of any package and this is meant to be like that”.
>>>
>>> Nautilus (or RPackage?) does provide the ‘Unpackaged’ category. Wouldn’t
>>> that be “good enough” for now?
>>>
>> People would emmediatly report bugs that there is unpackaged code.
>
> True.
>
>> We need to concept of “this is ok that there is no package”.
>
> But we don’t have that right now. And the problem with nil as category
> remains. How about replacing a nil category with ‘Unpackaged’ implicitly for
> the time being? It would at least “fix” one problem.
>
Ok.
Marcus
