EstebanLM wrote > is cool. > I would like to explore the possibility to replace our command line parser > with getopt. You know… is more compatible at the end :)
I find the implementation of our command line handlers very confusing. It seems like it grew organically from a smaller idea and the design got out of control. There are many assumptions that can make it hard to extend, especially to combine multiple options, as Ben and I discovered when implementing the "don't run startup scripts" handler. It would be nice to revisit starting from a behavioral specification. ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/GetOpt-tp4793474p4793621.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
