for the record this is something I am interested into contributing. It would be great if we coordinate effort . I don't make big promises but I can definitely spare some hours or even days. I am in the process of documenting Morphic and I definitely want something more interactive something more Pharo ;)
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:01 AM Sean P. DeNigris <s...@clipperadams.com> wrote: > philippeback wrote > > Pillar is fine as long as we aren't forced into the backend quirks to get > > a > > given output. > > This is actually much more productive than I thought it would be :) We've > identified some key intentions: > - easy to version > - easy to contribute > - live (whether preview rendering or model being worked on) > - portable (to other formats); i.e. not tied to one backend; I would add > here that any syntax is just a serialized, dead form of the live model, > which is what I really want to think about > - easy to use for beginners (like WYSIWYG, live help) > - pathway to efficient use for experts (a la command line, shortcuts, > gestures; not mouse selection) > > That's a really great list. And WYSIWYG and Pillar are two different > explorations into that problem space. But there is no point trying to > convince through words, only to produce your favored approach that adresses > those points more effectively than the other approach, or maybe we end up > with two amazing approaches, like emacs and vim and we can happily debate > forever ;) > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Improving-the-documentation-model-tp4820814p4821009.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > >
