That's a bit harsh, the fonts are the same ;-) And it is of course possible that you don't like it, it is a matter of taste. The contrast thing is also taste, but for some people it solve certain vision problems.
> On 24 Apr 2015, at 09:27, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name> wrote: > > That's funny because I tried it two days ago the first time and I didn't like > it. I had troubles to get anything but bitmap fonts. After setting all things > up I was a bit disappointed that contrast wise it doesn't work for me. Can > someone send a screenshot with one setup that he/she considers good? > > thanks, > > Norbert > >> Am 24.04.2015 um 08:38 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>: >> >> I disagree… DarkTheme is just for certain tastes, while regular one, while >> probably dated, is more “standard”. >> Also, DarkTheme is not ready. yeah, yeah… it works and works fine most of >> the time… but not *all* the time (take for example find string dialog… I >> never found the time to fix it, and nobody complained so… :P). Finally. we >> need to adopt SVG icons (in my TODO list since a couple of months, I will >> deliver soon, I hope), otherwise they do not look good (this is a problem >> eclipse itself had it… we are just inheriting it :) ) >> >> But a good question would be: How can we push forward our UI, besides using >> a darker or clearer theme? >> I would like to hear some opinions here :) >> >> Esteban >> >> >>> On 24 Apr 2015, at 08:33, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote: >>> >>> comments about color is to be taken with care. >>> >>> >>> Le 24/4/15 02:48, Sean P. DeNigris a écrit : >>>> Why didn't/don't we make it the default for 4.0? Everyone seems to love it, >>>> and people are commenting that the UI looks dated. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Cheers, >>>> Sean >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://forum.world.st/Release-with-Dark-Theme-tp4821496.html >>>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at >>>> Nabble.com. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
