icon design and web design are two very different things. I seriously doubt we can get the icon set we need as cheap as you might think.
but… we can always try :) Esteban > On 24 Apr 2015, at 14:55, p...@highoctane.be wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:33 PM, stepharo <steph...@free.fr > <mailto:steph...@free.fr>> wrote: > > > Le 24/4/15 11:06, p...@highoctane.be <mailto:p...@highoctane.be> a écrit : >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu >> <mailto:s...@stfx.eu>> wrote: >> That's a bit harsh, the fonts are the same ;-) >> And it is of course possible that you don't like it, it is a matter of taste. >> The contrast thing is also taste, but for some people it solve certain >> vision problems. >> >> Exactly. >> When you have floaters all day long, the last thing you want is a f*cking >> white screen. >> >> Now, I am using 3.0 with DawnTheme, which is more like SublimeText (in a >> 3.0). >> >> I tried the 4.0 and it is nice. Now, icons should get a pass because the >> artefacts on the edges are not nice. >> >> If there is some little petty cash available, that's the kind of job that >> can be done supercheap on something like https://en.99designs.be/ >> <https://en.99designs.be/>. That would be good use of consortium/association >> money for example. >> >> Why bother with graphics work when you can get things done professionaly for >> close to nil? > > do you know the people? > Because I would really be in favor getting people doing this job. > > This is a large community. > > One can get a full website design done for around $500. > Got that done and was nice work. > > Alternatives (used too): https://www.freelancer.com/ > <https://www.freelancer.com/> > > Phil > >> >> Phil >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 24 Apr 2015, at 09:27, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name >> > <mailto:norb...@hartl.name>> wrote: >> > >> > That's funny because I tried it two days ago the first time and I didn't >> > like it. I had troubles to get anything but bitmap fonts. After setting >> > all things up I was a bit disappointed that contrast wise it doesn't work >> > for me. Can someone send a screenshot with one setup that he/she considers >> > good? >> > >> > thanks, >> > >> > Norbert >> > >> >> Am 24.04.2015 um 08:38 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com >> >> <mailto:esteba...@gmail.com>>: >> >> >> >> I disagree… DarkTheme is just for certain tastes, while regular one, >> >> while probably dated, is more “standard”. >> >> Also, DarkTheme is not ready. yeah, yeah… it works and works fine most of >> >> the time… but not *all* the time (take for example find string dialog… I >> >> never found the time to fix it, and nobody complained so… :P). Finally. >> >> we need to adopt SVG icons (in my TODO list since a couple of months, I >> >> will deliver soon, I hope), otherwise they do not look good (this is a >> >> problem eclipse itself had it… we are just inheriting it :) ) >> >> >> >> But a good question would be: How can we push forward our UI, besides >> >> using a darker or clearer theme? >> >> I would like to hear some opinions here :) >> >> >> >> Esteban >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 24 Apr 2015, at 08:33, stepharo <steph...@free.fr >> >>> <mailto:steph...@free.fr>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> comments about color is to be taken with care. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Le 24/4/15 02:48, Sean P. DeNigris a écrit : >> >>>> Why didn't/don't we make it the default for 4.0? Everyone seems to love >> >>>> it, >> >>>> and people are commenting that the UI looks dated. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> ----- >> >>>> Cheers, >> >>>> Sean >> >>>> -- >> >>>> View this message in context: >> >>>> http://forum.world.st/Release-with-Dark-Theme-tp4821496.html >> >>>> <http://forum.world.st/Release-with-Dark-Theme-tp4821496.html> >> >>>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at >> >>>> Nabble.com. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >
