On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:33 PM, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote: > > > Le 24/4/15 11:06, p...@highoctane.be a écrit : > > > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> > wrote: > >> That's a bit harsh, the fonts are the same ;-) >> And it is of course possible that you don't like it, it is a matter of >> taste. >> The contrast thing is also taste, but for some people it solve certain >> vision problems. >> >> Exactly. > When you have floaters all day long, the last thing you want is a f*cking > white screen. > > Now, I am using 3.0 with DawnTheme, which is more like SublimeText (in a > 3.0). > > I tried the 4.0 and it is nice. Now, icons should get a pass because the > artefacts on the edges are not nice. > > If there is some little petty cash available, that's the kind of job > that can be done supercheap on something like https://en.99designs.be/. > That would be good use of consortium/association money for example. > > Why bother with graphics work when you can get things done professionaly > for close to nil? > > > do you know the people? > Because I would really be in favor getting people doing this job. >
This is a large community. One can get a full website design done for around $500. Got that done and was nice work. Alternatives (used too): https://www.freelancer.com/ Phil > > > Phil > > > > > > > >> > On 24 Apr 2015, at 09:27, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name> wrote: >> > >> > That's funny because I tried it two days ago the first time and I >> didn't like it. I had troubles to get anything but bitmap fonts. After >> setting all things up I was a bit disappointed that contrast wise it >> doesn't work for me. Can someone send a screenshot with one setup that >> he/she considers good? >> > >> > thanks, >> > >> > Norbert >> > >> >> Am 24.04.2015 um 08:38 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com >> >: >> >> >> >> I disagree… DarkTheme is just for certain tastes, while regular one, >> while probably dated, is more “standard”. >> >> Also, DarkTheme is not ready. yeah, yeah… it works and works fine most >> of the time… but not *all* the time (take for example find string dialog… I >> never found the time to fix it, and nobody complained so… :P). Finally. we >> need to adopt SVG icons (in my TODO list since a couple of months, I will >> deliver soon, I hope), otherwise they do not look good (this is a problem >> eclipse itself had it… we are just inheriting it :) ) >> >> >> >> But a good question would be: How can we push forward our UI, besides >> using a darker or clearer theme? >> >> I would like to hear some opinions here :) >> >> >> >> Esteban >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 24 Apr 2015, at 08:33, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> comments about color is to be taken with care. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Le 24/4/15 02:48, Sean P. DeNigris a écrit : >> >>>> Why didn't/don't we make it the default for 4.0? Everyone seems to >> love it, >> >>>> and people are commenting that the UI looks dated. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> ----- >> >>>> Cheers, >> >>>> Sean >> >>>> -- >> >>>> View this message in context: >> http://forum.world.st/Release-with-Dark-Theme-tp4821496.html >> >>>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at >> Nabble.com. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > > > >
