> > Let’s turn this energy into something positive. Please propose a concrete > set of default keybindings that you think would work better. In this > process, please take into account all keybindings that are already defined > in the code editor (it might not be so easy as it appears). >
As I've said: 1. can we unify the shift vs ctrl+shift nonsense? (I'm using linux btw) 2. can we use the default shortcuts pattern where one of the letters is underlined? as for the shortcuts themselves, problem is proceed, restart & into proceed: ctrl+shift+p is not taken, so I don't see why it has shortcut confusing with restart restart: ctrl+shift+r indents, but I'd argue that uniformity is more important here... indent is just convenience into: ctrl+shift+i is taken (I've never used it, but it maybe it's important), but we can still use ctrl+shift+n and underline n (point 2) If points 1 & 2 are implemented, then the letter is not as important, although first letter is always preferable. Peter > Cheers, > Doru > > > > On Apr 16, 2016, at 8:37 PM, Peter Uhnák <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm getting fed-up with GTDebugger shortcuts since they are completely > random. > > > > Can we have them more meaningful and/or somehow visible? > > > > For now I ended up overriding the labels so I can at least see them... > but doing this is also stupid, because I still have to look at them since I > cannot remember random shortcuts. > > > > <debugger.png> > > > > 1. can we unify the shift vs ctrl+shift nonsense? (I'm using linux btw) > > 2. can we use the default shortcuts pattern where one of the letters is > underlined? > > > > Peter > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > www.feenk.com > > "Value is always contextual." > > > > > >
