2016-08-09 22:53 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com>:

> Hi,
>
> > On Aug 9, 2016, at 10:48 PM, Nicolai Hess <nicolaih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > 2016-08-09 18:12 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > >
> > > Hey Doru,
> > > about what "two issues" are we talking? My only issue for now is,
> > > what shortcut shold we use for moving the cursor forward/backward
> word. Even if we introduce a new layer, at some point in time you need to
> > > define: If  the user types the CTRL+LEFT -key, even if we call it
> differently, some action happens, dive-out or move-backward-word ?
> > > At the moment (on windows) you can use both to move word-by-word:
> > > ctrl+left/right and alt+left/right, because this is how it is defined
> in rubrics action/cmdaction map.
> > >
> > > If we want to clean this up and use the kmdispatcher registration, I
> think we don't want to use both ctr and alt again, right?
> > > So, someone has to take the decision.
> > > I myself would prefer
> > > ctrl+left/right because this is what (all) many other programs are
> using on windows. Fine. But recently Spotter changed its
> > > dive in / dive out shortcut to use ctrl+left/right.
> > > Therefor I am asking you, why, and whether we want to keep it or not.
> If we want to keep it, we may
> > > - just overwrite the binding for the textfield -> not good, I think,
> you wouldn't be able to do word-by-word movements in the textfield anymore
> > > - overwrite the binding and use another binding for word-by-word
> moving, but just in spotters text field
> > > Or we revert that change and use the old shortcuts again.
> > > (And what to use for mac and linux?)
> > >
> > > but I am getting really tired of asking, and will do something else
> instead.
> >
> > The short answer: we will override the keybinding in the text morph for
> now. This will mean that we cannot move word by word in the text field
> using #control, but it will be consistent with all other platforms. Could
> you open an issue for this, please?
> >
> >
> > consistens on all platforms may not be the expectation for all users.
> Some users only working on a windows platform may want to have consistent
> behavior for all tools (applications).
>
> Well, you wanted a decision :).
>
>
> > On top of that, we will externalize all GTSpotter shortcuts through
> settings:
> > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/18455/Spotter-shortcuts-
> should-be-externalized-as-settings
> >
> > I really don't know why that.
>
> Because we do not have a generic KMDispatcher mechanism :).
>

yes and it does not make much sense as not all shortcuts are handled by the
kmdispatcher, thats why cleaning this
up and I think it would be better to do this instead of implementing yet
another only-for-this-tool solution.


>
>
> > We don't need a way to make Spotter shortcuts configurable, but *all*
> shortcuts.
> > That is why I try to move all shortcut definitions to the kmdispatcher,
> but it yet again took 2 month just to discuss what shortcut to use for
> cursor movement.
>
> I am not sure I understand. Was this me that stalled the discussion? If
> yes, it was not intentional. Is there anything I can do about this subject?
>

The whole discussion, the me: "hey, what shortcut to use?" you:"hey we have
a great idea, just let us add some new layers" :(


>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> >
> > Long answer: As explained before, the shortcut changed in the process of
> making all shortcuts uniform when Guille introduced #meta instead of
> #command (like it was before). The thing is that currently:
> > - #command means #alt on Win and #command on Mac, and
> > - #meta means #control on Win and #command on Mac.
> >
> > But, #command should be a low level key, not a portable one. It should
> not have a meaning on Windows, because the key does not exist on that
> platform.
> >
> > Moving to make keybindings uniform is a good thing, but only having
> #meta is not enough for situation like the one you mention. That is why I
> am proposing to introduce a #secondaryMeta as a platform-independent
> modifier that would mean #alt on Win and #control on Mac. We could use that
> one more consistently. Is this a better explanation?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Doru
> >
> >
> > --
> > www.tudorgirba.com
> > www.feenk.com
> >
> > "Presenting is storytelling."
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
> www.feenk.com
>
> "One cannot do more than one can do."
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to