2017-01-25 11:47 GMT+01:00 Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name>: > To be honest I think #isReadOnlyObject: is worse :) isXXX is a prefix for > testing methods. isXXX with an argument feels even more strange. I would > rather have #beReadOnly
Now there is #beReadOnlyObject and #beWritableObject. Maybe for primitive it is better to use #primReadOnlyObject:. It also raise another question: does these primitives support mirror approach? (when it can be called with receiver as first argument?)
