> On 25 Jan 2017, at 11:55, Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2017-01-25 11:47 GMT+01:00 Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name>: > To be honest I think #isReadOnlyObject: is worse :) isXXX is a prefix for > testing methods. isXXX with an argument feels even more strange. I would > rather have #beReadOnly > > Now there is #beReadOnlyObject and #beWritableObject. Maybe for primitive it > is better to use #primReadOnlyObject:.
why the object suffix, everything is an object, right ? the simplest wording is often the best, unless there is a good reason for something else. > It also raise another question: does these primitives support mirror > approach? (when it can be called with receiver as first argument?)
